How Your Jeweller Renders a CAD Design — and What to Look for Before You Approve It

A design-savvy buyer's guide to reading 3D renders, asking the right revision questions, and understanding the gap between the digital model and the finished ring — so your custom commission is exactly what you imagined.

You have had the consultation. You have described your vision — the stone shape, the setting style, the metal choice, the specific details that matter to you. And now your jeweller has sent through a CAD render: a photorealistic three-dimensional image of your ring as it will look when it is made. This is the moment where many custom commission clients feel uncertain.

The render looks beautiful. But is it exactly right? Are the proportions what you imagined? Is the stone sitting at the correct height? Are the prongs the right configuration? And what happens if something is not right — how do you ask for changes, and how many changes are reasonable before the commission moves to production? This guide to CAD engagement ring design in Melbourne answers all of those questions — and gives you the specific vocabulary and visual framework to engage with the render approval process as a genuinely informed participant.

At DG & Co. on Collins Street, we produce detailed CAD renders for every custom commission, and we regard the render approval stage not as a formality to be cleared but as a genuine creative collaboration. The client who knows what to look for in a render — who can articulate what they want changed and why — produces a better ring than the client who simply approves whatever they receive. This guide is designed to make you that client.

What CAD Actually Is — and What It Is Not

CAD stands for Computer-Aided Design. In fine jewellery, it refers to the process of building a three-dimensional digital model of a ring using specialist software — typically Rhinoceros (Rhino) with RhinoGold or Clayoo plugins, Matrix, or similar platforms developed specifically for the jewellery industry. The CAD operator (who may be the jeweller themselves, or a specialist in larger studios) builds the ring's structure mathematically — the exact dimensions of every element, the precise geometry of the prong configuration, the specific curvature of the shank profile.

The render — the photorealistic image you receive — is a visual output from that 3D model. Using rendering software such as KeyShot or V-Ray, the model is photographed in a virtual environment with simulated lighting, applied material textures (gold, platinum, stones), and reflections that approximate how the finished ring will look. A well-produced render from a skilled CAD operator is a remarkably accurate preview of the finished piece.

What CAD Is Not

CAD is not a photograph of the finished ring. There are differences between a render and a cast piece — some predictable, some subtle, all manageable if you know to look for them. The surface texture of polished metal looks slightly different in person than on screen. The weight of the ring cannot be felt from a render. The visual impact of the stone — the way it catches light as it moves — is approximated but not precisely replicated in a static render. Understanding these limitations is part of reading a render accurately.

CAD is also not a substitute for a clear brief. The most perfectly rendered ring in Melbourne is still the wrong ring if the brief was not specific enough about what the client actually wanted. According to RMIT University's School of Design, the communication between designer and client is the most critical variable in jewellery design outcomes — more important than either the technology used or the skill of the maker in isolation. CAD renders the brief; it does not replace it.

Table 1: CAD vs Hand Sketch vs Wax Model — Understanding Your Options

Different jewellers use different pre-production visualisation methods. Here is how they compare:

Factor	Hand Sketch	CAD (3D Render)	Wax / Resin Model
Accuracy to finished piece	Interpretive — artistic guide only	High — dimensionally precise	Very High — actual scale replica
Revision ease	Easy — redraw in minutes	Moderate — hours to adjust complex geometry	Low — remelt and reprint
Stone visualisation	Stylised / approximate	Photorealistic — exact stone position	Physical — actual stone can be placed temporarily
What client approves	Design direction and aesthetic	Exact proportions and geometry	Physical weight, scale, and balance
Cost to produce	Minimal	Moderate (CAD software and operator time)	Additional to CAD (printing/milling cost)
Lead time to approval	Minutes to days	Days to one week	3–7 days additional
What it cannot show	Exact proportions or details	Surface texture, weight, hand-feel	Photorealistic material colour
Best used for	Early concept exploration	All custom commissions; final approval stage	Complex or very high-value commissions

DG & Co. Melbourne uses CAD for all custom commissions, with hand sketches during the initial concept phase and wax/resin models available on request for complex or very high-value commissions.

How to Read a CAD Render: A Complete Visual Vocabulary

Most clients receive a render and look at it the way they look at a product photograph — assessing the overall aesthetic impression. This is necessary but not sufficient. A render approval is a technical review as much as an aesthetic one, and the specific elements that determine whether the finished ring is exactly right are not always the most visually prominent parts of the image.

The Views You Should Ask For

A single render from one angle is not enough to approve a custom ring. Before approving any CAD design, request the following views as a minimum:

Top-down view (plan view): shows the stone's position relative to the setting from directly above — the most useful view for assessing centering, prong placement, and pavé layout.

Front view (elevation): shows the ring from directly in front — useful for assessing prong height above the stone's table, shank width relative to the stone, and overall proportional balance.

Side view (profile): shows the ring from the side — essential for assessing how the ring sits above the finger, the profile of the prong setting, and the shank thickness.

Under-ring view (gallery): shows the ring from below — the most important view for assessing the gallery structure (the space beneath the stone), which directly affects how much light enters the stone and how comfortable the ring is to wear.

45-degree hero view: the most photorealistic angle, good for assessing overall aesthetic — but not for detailed technical review.

Standard render request for a DG & Co. Melbourne commission:

When you receive your first render, respond with this request: "Thank you — can you also send the top-down plan view, the front elevation, the side profile from both sides, and the under-ring gallery view? I want to review the stone placement and prong configuration in detail before approving." Any professional Melbourne jeweller will produce these views as a matter of course.

Table 2: The Complete CAD Render Review Checklist

Work through each of the following elements systematically before approving any CAD render:

Render Element	What to Examine	Common Issue to Catch	Action If Wrong
Shank width	Width at base, at shoulder, at finger gap — should be consistent or intentionally tapered	Shank too narrow to be durable for daily wear; uneven taper	Request dimension annotation; specify minimum mm
Prong height	Height above stone's table; should be just over the girdle to secure without obstruction	Prongs too short (stone insecure) or too tall (catching on fabric)	Ask jeweller to confirm mm height; view side profile render
Stone seating	Stone should appear level, centred, and at correct depth in the setting	Stone tilted, off-centre, or set too shallow/deep	Request orthographic (flat, undistorted) top-down view
Gallery profile	The structure beneath the stone — should be open enough for light entry but structurally sound	Gallery too closed (reduces brilliance) or too open (weak structure)	Ask for under-ring render view; check gallery bars
Pavé spacing	Small stones should appear evenly spaced with consistent metal between them	Uneven spacing; stones overlapping in render	Request zoomed-in render of pavé section
Prong count and style	Count the prongs; confirm V-tip for fancy shapes; confirm style matches brief	Wrong prong count; flat tips instead of V-tips for marquise	Correct immediately — prong style affects structural integrity
Band thickness	The depth of the band (from inner to outer surface); thin bands feel insubstantial	Visually fine in render but too thin in reality	Request mm specifications in written brief
Finger clearance	Gap between stone setting and finger surface; too low and setting contacts skin uncomfortably	Setting profile too flat — will contact knuckles uncomfortably	Request profile view from the side
Surface finish	Render may show polished, brushed, or hammered texture; confirm it matches your preference	Render defaults to polished; brushed or hammered may need to be specified	Specify finish in brief; ask jeweller to confirm in render notes

 

Your CAD Render Review Checklist — print and use:

☐  Stone is centred and level in the setting (check from top-down view)

☐  Stone sits at correct height — neither sunken nor elevated beyond brief

☐  Prong count matches brief; V-tip prongs specified for marquise/pear/oval

☐  Prong height appears proportional to stone — not too tall, not too short

☐  Shank width is consistent with brief specification (ask for mm if uncertain)

☐  Band thickness looks substantial enough for daily wear (minimum ~1.3mm)

☐  Gallery is open enough to allow light entry beneath the stone

☐  Pavé stones (if present) appear evenly spaced in zoomed-in view

☐  Setting orientation matches brief (N–S vs E–W for elongated shapes)

☐  Surface finish matches brief (polished / brushed / hammered)

☐  Metal colour matches specified alloy (yellow gold / white gold / platinum)

☐  Inner shank profile is smooth and comfortable-looking (no sharp edges)

☐  Wedding band profile is shown alongside ring (if applicable)

☐  Overall proportional balance feels right — no element dominates incorrectly

 

FAQ #1: How many revision rounds should I expect — and is it normal to ask for changes?

Not only is it normal — it is actively encouraged, and the data shows it produces better outcomes. Clients who engage in two or more revision rounds before approving a CAD design are significantly more satisfied with their finished ring than those who approve the first render without requesting any changes. Revisions are part of the design process, not a burden on the jeweller or a sign that the first render was poorly made. They are the mechanism by which the design becomes precisely yours rather than approximately yours. At DG & Co., we regard revision rounds as evidence that the client is engaged, and we welcome every specific, detailed change request. The only revision that is difficult is one that fundamentally changes the design brief after production has begun — which is why the render approval stage exists: to catch all of these changes before any irreversible work is done.

The Data: Why Revision Rounds Produce Better Rings

Figure 1: Number of CAD Revision Rounds vs Client Satisfaction Score — DG & Co. Melbourne Custom Commissions (2023–2025, n=280)

Revision History	Post-Delivery Satisfaction Score (each block = 10%)
0 revisions (first render approved)			68%
1 revision round			82%
2 revision rounds			90%
3 revision rounds			94%
4+ revision rounds		95%

Post-delivery satisfaction surveys of 280 DG & Co. Melbourne custom commission clients, 2023–2025. Satisfaction score = self-reported certainty the finished ring matched their vision, assessed at time of collection. Key finding: clients who engaged in 2+ revision rounds were 26% more satisfied than those who approved the first render without revision.

The chart makes the case clearly: clients who approved the first render without requesting any changes reported a 68% satisfaction score at collection — the lowest in the survey. Those who engaged in two or three revision rounds scored 90–94%. The pattern is consistent: each revision round that catches a specific misalignment between the render and the client's vision produces a ring that is more precisely right.

The lesson is not that jewellers produce poor first renders — it is that the render approval process is a genuinely collaborative one, and the clients who treat it that way get better results. A revision request is not a complaint; it is the most useful thing a client can contribute to their commission.

How to Request a Revision: The Language That Works

The most productive revision requests are specific, visual, and reference the render directly. Vague feedback ("it doesn't feel quite right") gives the jeweller nothing to act on. Specific feedback ("the prongs appear to be approximately 3–4mm above the stone's table in the front elevation view — can we reduce this to approximately 1.5–2mm to lower the stone's profile?") gives them everything they need.

Describing What You Want Changed

Reference the view: "In the top-down view, the stone appears to sit slightly left of centre — can this be corrected?" is more useful than "the stone doesn't look right."

Use proportional language: "The shank looks too narrow in the side profile view — can it be increased by approximately 20%?" is more actionable than "the band looks thin."

Reference the brief: "The brief specified a 1.6mm shank width — the side profile view suggests the current model may be narrower than this. Can you confirm the specification?"

Describe the desired outcome, not just the problem: "The prongs in the plan view appear to be obscuring a significant portion of the stone's surface. I would like the prongs to be narrower so that more of the stone is visible between them. Is a lower-profile claw setting achievable?"

What Not to Say

"Can you make it more beautiful?" is not a useful revision request — it gives no specific direction and invites the jeweller to interpret your preference, which they cannot do without more information.

"Can you make the diamond bigger in the render?" is not achievable — the diamond's size in the render is determined by the actual stone specification you have approved. If you want a larger stone, that is a stone-sourcing change, not a render revision.

"It looks different from the ring I saw on Instagram" is worth exploring — but requires you to share the reference image and identify specifically what element you are trying to achieve, so the jeweller can assess whether it is achievable within the current brief.

The Gap Between CAD and Cast: What to Expect

The honest conversation that many jewellers avoid — because it requires explaining the limitations of the process they are selling — is the gap between what CAD shows and what casting produces. This gap is not a failure of quality; it is a property of how jewellery is manufactured. Understanding it allows you to set appropriate expectations before collection, rather than experiencing the difference as a surprise.

What CAD Shows	What Sometimes Happens in Casting	How to Minimise the Gap
Perfect, uniform pavé spacing	Minor stone-size variation; slight spacing differences	Specify stone tolerance in brief; view setter's previous work
Crisp, sharp edges on geometric elements	Slight softening of edges during casting and polishing	Request hand-finishing for critical edges; choose fabrication over casting for sharpest lines
Smooth, flat surface planes	Very subtle surface waviness in large flat areas	Ask jeweller whether piece will be cast or fabricated; prefer fabrication for flat-plane designs
Exact prong height and angle	Prong adjustment during setting may alter angle slightly	Request post-setting inspection; confirm prong height is maintained after stone is set
Uniform polish across all surfaces	Inner shank may have different finish from outer; recesses may be harder to reach	Specify inner shank finish requirements explicitly; request photographs of inner surface
Stone appears to float in tension settings	Stone may sit with very slight visible gap at tension points	Discuss fit tolerance with jeweller; confirm stone is fitted before committing to this setting style
Exactly matching metal colour	Yellow gold alloys vary slightly batch to batch	For matched pieces (band and ring), specify same batch; for white gold, confirm rhodium plating schedule

The gap between CAD and cast is smallest when: (a) the jeweller has extensive experience with the specific design type; (b) the casting and finishing is done in-house by the same team; (c) the design brief was very specific and well-documented; and (d) the jeweller has shown you finished examples of similar previous commissions.

How to Minimise the Gap Before Production Begins

Ask to see finished examples. The most reliable predictor of what a jeweller's finished rings look like is other finished rings they have made. If a Melbourne jeweller can show you completed commissions of similar complexity to yours — rings where you can assess the prong quality, the pavé spacing, the shank finish — that evidence is more valuable than any render.

Request a wax or resin model for complex designs. A printed model at actual scale, while not showing material colour or reflective quality, allows you to assess the ring's physical size and proportion on a real hand before any gold or platinum is worked. For a commission above a certain value, this is always worth the additional cost.

Specify in writing. Every material decision in the brief should be documented: metal alloy and carat, stone specification with grading report reference, minimum shank width in millimetres, prong count and configuration, surface finish. A written brief reduces the gap between intent and execution because it eliminates interpretive latitude at the production stage.

FAQ #2: What happens if the finished ring is not what I approved in the CAD render?

This situation is rare at reputable Melbourne jewellers with experienced in-house production teams — but it does occasionally occur, and knowing your rights before it happens is important. If the finished ring materially differs from the approved CAD render in a way that constitutes a manufacturing defect or a deviation from the agreed brief, the jeweller has a responsibility to rectify it. Under Australian Consumer Law, goods must be of acceptable quality and match their description — and an approved CAD render constitutes part of the description of what you agreed to purchase. Practically, "materially different" means a structural or dimensional deviation that changes the ring's appearance, function, or wearability. Minor variations within the normal CAD-to-cast gap (subtle surface texture differences, very small proportional variations) are expected and acceptable. Significant deviations — a wrong stone shape, incorrect metal, prongs that do not match the render — are not. At DG & Co., we have an explicit client satisfaction guarantee on all custom commissions: if the finished ring deviates materially from the approved render without agreed modification, we remake or rectify at no additional cost.

Design Elements That Read Differently in CAD vs Reality

Beyond the structural elements covered in the checklist, there are specific design features that are worth particular attention when reviewing renders — because they are the areas where the gap between CAD and reality tends to be most pronounced.

Pavé and Micro-Pavé

Pavé settings — where small diamonds are set in close formation, held by tiny grains of metal — look very uniform and precise in CAD renders because the software places each stone at exactly the modelled coordinates. In reality, micro-pavé setting is a hand skill, and there are very subtle variations in stone placement that are invisible to the naked eye but visible under magnification. This is not a defect; it is evidence of human craftsmanship. The diamond engagement ring with side stones and halo configurations that Melbourne buyers most frequently request showcase this craft in their final form — the slight warmth of hand-set pavé is part of what distinguishes a made-in-Melbourne ring from a machine-produced one.

Milgrain and Surface Texture

Milgrain — the tiny beaded texture applied to the edges of Edwardian-inspired settings — is often simplified in CAD renders. The individual beads may appear as a smooth line or a slightly rippled edge rather than the fine, crisp individual beading that an experienced engraver produces. If milgrain is a specific requirement of your brief, ask the jeweller to show you photographs of milgrain work they have completed previously, rather than assessing it from the render alone.

Stone Brightness in the Render

CAD renders of diamond rings frequently show the diamond at its most brilliant — a perfect virtual sparkle that represents ideal light conditions. The finished ring will sparkle magnificently in strong direct light, and less so in dim or diffuse light. This is not a defect — it is how diamonds behave. The render's simulation of sparkle should not be taken as a guarantee of a specific visual performance standard; it is an approximation of how the ring looks under optimal conditions. For reference, our three carat emerald cut diamond ring in 18ct yellow gold with hidden halo — one of our most complex Melbourne commissions — was rendered in CAD before making, and the finished piece exceeded the render in the quality of light it produces. This is the best possible outcome of the process: a ring that surpasses its digital preview.

Metal Colour and Warmth

Yellow gold in a render is typically a vivid, saturated yellow that approximates the colour of freshly polished 18ct gold. In reality, gold's colour varies with the specific alloy, patina over time with wear, and looks different under incandescent versus daylight lighting. White gold in a render appears as a cool, bright white — which is accurate immediately after rhodium plating, but the plating will wear over time to reveal the slightly warmer white of the gold alloy beneath. rhodium plating is a regular maintenance service that restores this brightness; understanding that the render represents the freshly plated state sets appropriate long-term expectations.

FAQ #3: Can I change my mind about an element after I've approved the CAD but before production starts?

Yes — and this is precisely why the window between CAD approval and production commencement matters. At DG & Co., there is typically a brief period after CAD approval during which final brief changes can still be incorporated before the design goes to the production stage. If you have approved a render and then — within hours or a day or two — realised that you want to change a specific element, contact the jeweller immediately. The earlier the change is requested, the less disruption it causes and the more likely it is to be accommodated without additional cost. Changes requested after the wax model has been printed or after casting has begun are progressively more expensive and disruptive. Changes requested after the stone has been set are the most complex — in some cases, the ring would need to be entirely remade. This is why thorough render review before approval is not just a courtesy — it is a genuine cost-saving exercise.

The DG & Co. CAD Process: What Our Melbourne Clients Experience

Understanding the specific CAD and approval workflow at DG & Co. helps set expectations for buyers entering the custom commission process with us.

Stage One: The Design Brief

Every custom commission begins with a detailed written brief — not just a verbal conversation, but a documented specification that both the client and the design team sign off. This brief covers stone specification (with reference to the grading certificate), metal choice and carat, setting style with reference images where available, shank width minimum, prong configuration, surface finish, and any specific requirements around the inner shank or gallery. The brief becomes the definitive reference document for both the CAD operator and the bench jewellers who will make the ring. Our custom engagement rings melbourne service is built around this brief-first philosophy — we spend as much time on the brief as we do on the first render, because a precise brief produces a precise ring.

Stage Two: The First Render

The first CAD render is produced within approximately five to ten business days of brief sign-off, depending on design complexity. Clients receive a minimum of three views (hero, plan, and profile) as standard, with gallery and elevation views available on request. For designs referencing our existing collection — which clients can explore through the diamond ring creator tool before their consultation — the first render often requires fewer revisions because the reference starting point is already well-established.

Stage Three: Revision Rounds

We do not limit revision rounds. A revision is a productive part of the design process, and we would rather receive five specific revision requests and produce a ring that is exactly right than receive zero revision requests and produce a ring that is approximately right. Our CAD operators document every revision request and confirm changes in writing before implementing them, creating a clear record of what changed and why.

Stage Four: Final Approval and Production

Once the client approves the final render — in writing, with explicit sign-off on all specified elements — the design moves to production. For most rings, this means the CAD model is used to mill a wax or resin model, which is used for lost-wax casting. The cast piece is then finished — filed, polished, and surface-treated — before the stone is set by our Melbourne bench jewellers. For complex filigree or flat-plane geometric designs, we use direct fabrication rather than casting, which produces the sharpest possible edges and most precise flat surfaces. Our full range of ring style options shows the variety of what our CAD-to-production workflow can produce.

CAD Considerations for Specific Ring Designs

Different ring styles require specific attention to different render elements. Here is what to focus on by ring type.

Solitaire Rings

For solitaire designs, the critical render elements are stone height above the finger (assessed in the side profile view), prong proportion relative to the stone (thin prongs allow more stone visibility; thicker prongs provide more security), and the shank profile (whether it tapers toward the stone or remains consistent width). A solitaire's simplicity means every element is visible — there is nowhere for imprecision to hide.

Halo and Pavé Designs

For halo and pavé designs, request a zoomed-in render of the pavé section and the halo specifically. Check that the halo's outer edge is consistent in width around the full circumference. Check that the pavé stones in the shank (if applicable) appear to flow naturally into the halo without an abrupt visual break at the shoulder. The white gold marquise engagement ring australia with a halo requires particular attention to how the halo's shape follows the marquise's pointed ends — a well-designed marquise halo tapers to follow the stone's silhouette rather than presenting a blunt end.

Three-Stone Designs

For three stone engagement ring melbourne designs, the critical render review focuses on the proportional relationship between centre and side stones (the side stones should complement without competing), the gap between the stones (too tight and they appear crowded; too wide and the visual connection is lost), and the height alignment across all three stones (they should appear at the same height in the front elevation view, unless a graduated height is specifically desired).

Wedding Bands and Matching Sets

For wedding set designs where both the engagement ring and wedding band are being produced together, always request a render showing both pieces side by side and, importantly, fitted together as they will be worn. The junction between the two rings — how the band's profile meets the engagement ring's shoulder — is the most critical element to assess in the render, and it is the most commonly overlooked. For groom or partner rings, a platinum band wedding ring should be rendered in the correct metal from the beginning — the visual difference between platinum and white gold matters in the render review, even though both appear white.

Coloured Stone Rings

For coloured stone commissions — whether a white gold aquamarine ring in a bezel setting, or a tanzanite for engagement ring in a halo configuration — ask the CAD operator to apply the correct stone colour to the render rather than a placeholder colour. Most CAD software allows the stone's colour and transparency to be adjusted in the render; a deep blue tanzanite renders very differently from a pale blue aquamarine, and seeing the actual stone colour in context is essential to approving the setting proportions correctly.

Where CAD Fits in the Broader Custom Commission Picture

The CAD render approval process is one stage in a broader custom commission journey, and understanding where it sits helps place its importance in context.

Before the render comes the stone sourcing — the process of identifying and approving the specific diamond or gemstone that will be set in the ring. For buyers who are not certain what they want, our diamond ring creator tool provides a starting point for exploring stone and setting combinations. For buyers who want to understand the cost landscape before committing to a commission, our diamond rings melbourne prices guide provides the most comprehensive 2026 Melbourne pricing reference available.

After the render comes production — casting or fabrication, setting, finishing, and quality inspection. For buyers who are commissioning a ring that will eventually need companion pieces, it is worth noting that a gemstone wedding bands or eternity band settings designed and CAD-rendered simultaneously with the engagement ring is always more coherent than one sourced later, because both pieces are built to nest together from the first digital model.

For buyers who have previously purchased a ring that needs reimagining — perhaps because the design has dated, the setting has worn, or the stone deserves a new context — our jewellery remodel service uses exactly the same CAD-first process: we model the new design around the existing stone, produce renders for approval, and fabricate the new setting to the approved specification. The stone's history and provenance are preserved; the ring begins a new chapter.

And for buyers who want to understand the question that often arises after the engagement ring decision is made — is engagement ring and wedding ring the same — the answer has direct implications for the CAD process: if both pieces are being designed together, they should be modelled together from the outset, and the render approval should show them fitted as a pair.

CAD for Every Budget

The CAD design process is not exclusively for high-budget commissions. At DG & Co., we apply the same CAD-first workflow to every custom or semi-custom engagement ring — from our most accessible cheap proposal ring commissions through to our most ambitious bespoke pieces. The render review process is the same regardless of budget: the client approves specific proportions and details before any metal is worked.

What differs at different budget levels is the complexity of the design (and therefore the number of revision rounds typically needed), and the availability of a physical wax or resin model as a pre-production approval step. For straightforward solitaire or simple halo designs at accessible budget levels, a CAD render alone is generally sufficient. For elaborate multi-element designs or very high-value commissions, a physical model is almost always worth the additional cost and time.

For buyers who are exploring whether natural moissanite or other alternative stones are right for their commission — the CAD process is identical regardless of the stone type. The render will show a placeholder stone in the appropriate colour and transparency, and the same approval criteria apply. What changes is the stone's specific optical behaviour in the finished ring — moissanite's higher refractive index and distinctive dispersion differs from diamond's, and this is worth discussing with your jeweller when reviewing the render's simulated stone brilliance.

The Render Is the Conversation — Not the Conclusion

A CAD render is not an announcement. It is a question: "Is this what you wanted?" And the most productive answer is a detailed, specific, thoughtful response — not a quick approval.

The time you invest in reviewing the render carefully, requesting the additional views you need, and articulating the specific changes that will bring the design closer to your vision is the most valuable investment you can make in a custom commission. It is time that the jeweller is genuinely glad you spend, because it produces a cleaner production brief and a ring that is more precisely right.

At DG & Co. on Collins Street — melbourne jewellers collins street specialists with the deepest custom commission experience in the city — we regard the render review process as a privilege. It is the moment when the ring becomes specific to the person who will wear it. It is the moment when the commission transforms from a specification into a story. We invite every client to treat it that way — with the attention, the curiosity, and the confidence that this decision deserves.

For buyers who want to see the full range of what our CAD process can produce — from a modest stone oval cut vintage three-stone in a simple open gallery setting to a complex diamond in gold design with elaborate hand-engraving and a mixed-stone arrangement — come in and look at the work. The finished rings are the truest statement of what our CAD-to-production workflow delivers. And a 9ct gold locket bracelet produced through the same careful brief-and-render process as any engagement ring commission demonstrates that the attention to detail we bring extends to every piece in the collection, not only the largest.

— DG & Co. Jewellery | Collins Street, Melbourne | Where Every Custom Commission Begins with a Conversation